Clinical trial of Iohexol vs. Conray 60 for cerebral angiography.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Iohexol, a new nonionic contrast agent, and Conray 60 were compared in a double-blind clinical trial of 60 patients for safety, imaging effectiveness, and patient discomfort in cerebral angiography. There was no significant difference between the two agents in physiologic changes, film quality, or incidence of adverse effects in the 60 patients. One patient in the iohexol group suffered a cardiac arrest, which was clinically due to septic shock and was probably the result of inadvertent contamination of the iohexol used for test injections in this case. Bacterial growth can be supported in iohexol under certain circumstances, due to the lack of preservatives in this contrast material. The patients in the iohexol group experienced significantly less discomfort than the Conray 60 group. Iohexol is a safe, effective contrast agent when handled properly and causes less discomfort to patients than Conray 60.
منابع مشابه
Neuroangiography with lohexol
lohexol is a new, non ionic water-soluble contrast agent undergoing early clinical trials in the United States. Using a doubleblind , parallel format, iohexol was compared with meglumine iothalamate (60 patients) for selective cerebral angiography, and with sodium meglumine diatrizoate (40 patients) for arch aortography. lohexol produced significantly less pain than meglumine iothalamate or sod...
متن کاملSafety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
A randomized double-blind study was performed in 27 patients to compare the clinical safety, incidence of pain and warmth, and film quality produced by iopamidol and Conray-60 in selective cerebral angiography. No complications or adverse reactions occurred in either group. Iopamidol was significantly less painful than was methylglucamine iothalamate for common carotid artery injections and cau...
متن کاملA comparison of iopamidol and iohexol in cerebral angiography.
Iopamidol and iohexol, the new nonionic low-osmolality contrast agents, have both been shown to be safe, effective, and better tolerated than conventional ionic agents for cerebral angiography. In this randomized, double-blind study involving 40 patients, these two agents were compared for adverse effects, radiographic quality, and patient tolerance. No significant differences were observed in ...
متن کاملComparison of Iohexol-380 and Iohexol-350 for Coronary CT Angiography: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 3 Trial.
OBJECTIVE This multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of contrast agents iohexol-380 and iohexol-350 for coronary CT angiography in healthy subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS Volunteers were randomized to receive 420 mgI/kg of either iohexol-350 or iohexol-380 using a flow rate of 4 mL/sec. All adverse events were recorded. Two blin...
متن کاملEffect of Heparin Administration during Coronary Angiography on Vascular or Peripheral Complications: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background: Coronary angiography consists of the selective injection of contrast agents in coronary arteries. Optimal strategy for heparin administration during coronary angiography has yet to be determined. We assessed the effect of heparin administration during coronary angiography on vascular, hemorrhagic, and ischemic complications.Methods: Five hundred candiates for diagnostic coronary ang...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
دوره 5 5 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1984